Search
Login
Subscribe
Archive
Subscribe
Cash & Chaos
RTX Q3 2026: Growth, tariff recovery and the cash test
Oct 29, 2026
RTX Q3 2026: Growth, tariff recovery and the cash test
15
30
00:00
10:52
1×
Listen on
Apple Podcasts
Apple Podcasts
Spotify
Spotify
Pocket Casts
Pocket Casts
Castro
Castro
Transcript
0:00
RTX's adjusted earnings per share grew thirty-three percent, but even that adjusted result included a tariff cost recovery while quarterly cash flow weakened. The core business grew.
0:12
The headline needs a little accounting before we decide how much of the improvement is repeatable. Welcome to Cash and Chaos.
0:20
We're explaining RTX's third quarter of twenty twenty-six ended September thirtieth and reported October twentieth. This is a dated earnings analysis, not a current stock quote.
0:32
RTX combines businesses serving commercial aviation and defense.
0:37
Some revenue follows aircraft production, some follows maintenance and the use of the installed fleet, some follows defense contracts with their own delivery and funding milestones.
0:48
That range can spread demand across several customer groups. It doesn't make the cash schedule uniform.
0:55
A long contract can require suppliers, inventory, and engineering before the associated revenue or customer payment arrives.
1:03
It also means a backlog total is a collection of obligations with different economics rather than one giant sale waiting to be deposited.
1:12
We will examine the completed quarterly business first, then identify the recovery benefit inside adjusted earnings, and finally test the cash and the revised annual outlook.
1:24
Profit and cash moved in different directions. RTX's October twentieth results show twenty-four point nine six five billion dollars of sales and two dollars and twenty-six cents of adjusted earnings per share.
1:38
The business grew in commercial aerospace and defense, but cash did not follow the same quarterly path. Free cash flow declined both against second quarter and against the same quarter last year.
1:51
That is a reason to examine the bridge, not to assume the earnings are fictitious.
1:56
Aerospace production, customer advances, repairs, and long-term defense contracts create timing differences between reported revenue and money collected.
2:05
A useful result analysis needs to identify those differences without treating every favorable adjustment as recurring. Adjusted earnings per share still contains a recovery benefit.
2:18
RTX disclosed twenty-five cents of earnings per share from IEPA tariff cost recovery within its adjusted result.
2:27
Subtracting that specified benefit from two dollars and twenty-six cents gives a cash and chaos sensitivity of two dollars and one cent, approximately eighteen percent above the prior year adjusted one dollar and seventy cents.
2:41
The company's published growth was thirty-three percent. This sensitivity is not a full normalized result, and it does not remove every unusual item in either period.
2:53
The twenty-five cents benefit accounts arithmetically for about forty-five percent of the fifty-six cents year-over-year adjusted earnings per share increase.
3:03
The remainder still indicates earnings progress on this limited comparison.
3:08
The point is to distinguish operating improvement from recovering a previously incurred cost rather than conclude that either all or none of the profit growth was durable.
3:19
The word adjusted is helpful only when its definition stays attached. One charge might be excluded because the company considers it outside the measure it uses to discuss operations.
3:30
A different benefit may remain inside. That isn't necessarily an accounting error, but it means adjusted growth isn't automatically identical to a clean recurring growth rate.
3:41
The tariff cost recovery provides a specific example. Removing that one disclosed benefit lets us ask a narrower question. Did profits still improve without it?
3:52
It doesn't justify claiming every other period-specific effect has been eliminated. The same discipline applies at segment level.
4:00
We can examine the recovery sensitivity while keeping the company-reported adjusted result visible. This gives a more useful picture than treating all exceptional items as either meaningless or permanently repeatable.
4:14
Our specified item sensitivity removes approximately two hundred and fifty million dollars from Collins Aerospace's company-adjusted operating profit and about one hundred and sixty million from Pratt and Whitney.
4:27
The remaining figures are still profits, not a forecast of the next quarter. We are not deducting an invented estimate or rewriting the company's accounts.
4:36
We are isolating the disclosed recovery to see how much it contributes. That is especially useful when a large growth percentage is presented as if it all came from ordinary volume and cost execution.
4:49
The recovery matters more to Pratt's margin reading. Collins benefited from commercial volume and mix. Pratt and Whitney benefited from aftermarket demand.
5:00
While its reported result also included a customer bankruptcy charge. Company-adjusted segment profit excludes that charge but retains tariff recovery.
5:10
Applying the same label to those two treatments can obscure which economics changed. Our calculation below removes only the approximate disclosed recoveries.
5:21
Collins still earns about eighteen point three percent of sales on that sensitivity above its prior year company-adjusted margin of fifteen point seven percent.
5:31
Pratt falls to roughly eight point eight percent, close to its prior year eight point nine percent.
5:38
That is a materially different conclusion from assuming both headline margin increases have the same operating foundation.
5:46
Pratt's twenty-one percent commercial aftermarket growth alongside a five percent commercial OE sales decline also demonstrates why install base activity and new engine deliveries need separate treatment.
5:59
A growing services stream is valuable, but mix and repair requirements can affect the margin earned on each additional dollar. Backlog establishes demand, not the profit on delivery.
6:11
Backlog reached three hundred and forty billion dollars compared with two hundred and eighty-nine billion dollars at second quarter.
6:19
The defense portion increased from one hundred and nineteen billion dollars to one hundred and sixty-four billion dollars.
6:26
The quarter included large Tomahawk and AMRAAM production awards, including undefinitized contracts whose final terms still require completion.
6:36
Those orders improve visibility, but the dollars are not cash already available to shareholders. Production needs components, capacity, and customer milestones.
6:47
Margins depend on the cost of fulfilling the contracts and their eventual terms. Faster delivery can also use working capital before it releases cash.
6:57
It would therefore be misleading to treat the backlog increase as an equivalent improvement in current earnings power. Raytheon's operating improvement gives a more immediate piece of evidence than backlog alone.
7:10
Still, the company disclosed about eighty-five million dollars of favorable contract-related productivity benefits in that segment.
7:19
A reader should distinguish higher throughput from favorable contract adjustments before carrying the whole quarter's margin forward. The year-to-date record is stronger than the quarter.
7:30
Third quarter operating cash flow of two point eight six eight billion dollars less seven hundred and forty-nine million of capital spending gives two point one one nine billion dollars of free cash flow.
7:43
Over the first nine months, however, operating cash flow increased to eight point two seven zero billion dollars from six point four zero two billion dollars.
7:52
Both comparisons are true, and the stronger cumulative record is important counter-evidence to a simple cash deterioration thesis.
8:01
The nine-month filing identifies lower cash support from contract liabilities, partly offset by collections of receivables as working capital influences.
8:13
Those are cumulative explanations, not a complete attribution of the single quarter decline. The filing also notes increased receivables factoring activity.
8:23
Collecting or selling receivables earlier can help cash timing without changing the ultimate economics of the underlying order.
8:31
About zero point three billion dollars of third quarter operating cash came from tariff recovery. Removing only that rounded amount would reduce the quarter's cash measure.
8:42
It would not explain all of the year-over-year change. We would not present that subtraction as an audited alternative cash flow statement. The outlook rose on more than one line.
8:53
The July and October outlooks show higher expected sales, organic growth, adjusted earnings per share, and free cash flow. That is stronger support than a revenue-only guidance increase.
9:06
These ranges remain management forecasts, not reported annual results or analyst consensus.
9:13
The annual earnings per share midpoint increased by zero point five two five dollars from seven point one seven five dollars to seven dollars and seventy cents.
9:24
The disclosed quarterly twenty-five cents recovery is material beside that change, but it would be too strong to attribute a precise share of the guidance revision to it.
9:34
The outlook also incorporates operations, taxes, and other assumptions. The comparison records what changed without inventing a management bridge.
9:44
The revised outlook covers sales, adjusted earnings, and free cash flow, which is more informative than raising only the revenue line, but it still requires execution and collection.
9:57
A large backlog can support confidence in future work while creating demands on inventory, engineering, and suppliers.
10:05
The growth case strengthens when those demands produce attractive profits in cash rather than just a larger commitment list.
10:13
The current evidence supports a real operating improvement across demand pools with a meaningful recovery benefit and a weaker quarterly cash comparison.
10:23
Keeping those qualifications attached gives us a more durable conclusion than an unqualified beat and raise headline. That's Cash in Chaos.
10:33
The original dated company release, filing, and full analysis are linked in the show notes. Analysis is by Cash in Chaos research team. This is educational business analysis, not a recommendation to buy or sell shares.
10:49
This episode uses a synthetic narrator.
New episodes, straight to your inbox.
Subscribe
