Hawthorne facility, 2012 archive; cropped. SpaceX / Wikimedia, CC0. SpaceX reported roughly $14.6 billion in quarterly revenue, up 161%, and $4.4 billion in net income. Elon Musk also said SpaceX and Tesla have formed special committees to explore a possible merger, according to CNN’s earnings coverage. The results are in; a merger is still a proposal. There is no agreed transaction, exchange ratio or completion date. Investors can judge the quarter now, but they cannot yet calculate what combining the businesses would mean for each share. Musk said he would not participate in the merger decision because of his interests in both companies. Independent review matters here: a deal could benefit one set of shareholders more than the other, depending on the price, financing and ownership split. Reported earnings were $0.35 per share, versus the $0.14 FactSet expectation cited by CNN. Revenue exceeded the reported $12.9 billion estimate by roughly $1.7 billion, or 13%. The $4.4 billion net profit represents about 30 cents of every revenue dollar, based on the rounded reported figures. Axios reports quarterly capital spending of $19.59 billion, up from $6.88 billion a year earlier. That is about $5 billion more than revenue. Spending above revenue does not by itself tell us free cash flow, but it shows why net income alone cannot describe the financing burden. Capital spending rose by $12.71 billion from a year earlier, roughly 185%—faster than revenue. That spending buys assets whose costs can be recognized over many years. The cash leaves sooner. Operating cash flow, rather than net profit, is the starting point for calculating how much outside funding the expansion needs. The merger question adds a second calculation: who gets what? In a hypothetical all-share deal, the exchange ratio determines how much of the combined company each group owns. Existing debt and future investment commitments matter too. These are mechanics to examine if terms emerge, not details of an announced agreement. For Tesla holders, the terms would determine their exposure to SpaceX’s assets and spending. SpaceX holders would need to judge the value of what they receive. Musk’s recusal leaves the committees with the central job: negotiating a transaction their respective shareholders can assess on its economics. |